| ISO 9001:2008 vs. ISO 9001:2000 - new ISO 9000 requirements |
| ISO 9001 2008 - ISO 9001 2008 Articles | |
|
Congratulations to all of us quality managers. We have a new standard. ISO 9001: 2008. This is really an exciting moment for quality managers. In order to celebrate this event in a way that only quality managers know how, we prepared here a comparison article between the ISO 9001:2000 and the new born ISO 9001:2008. We also included our comments regarding our experience and our perspective of things. At the end of it we will summon the new requirements from the ISO 9001:2008 standard.
Our comment - Of course. The world is getting greener every day so they must remind you of the ISO 14001 standard. I believe and recommend to any organization that is needed of the ISO 14001 standard to implement also the 9001. There is a big correlation between these two. They actually help one another.
Our comment - After so many years of auditions the long last debate had been settled. Statutory legal requirements and statutory requirements are obliged to the purchasing processes. It was always an open area that no one had the correct answer: is your supplier must follow the law or not? Apparently yes.
Our comment - Come on, like it wasn't obvious before....
Our comment - It's about time. A lot of headaches are vowed to be save. If your audit was one of the old school and demanded everything by the book - now you may combine two quality procedures to one document: Job description and training for example or you can split one document into two. How ever it is suitable for you as long as you provide the demands.
Our comment - That addition puts all external consultants at risk - you can no longer be the management representative. That sets a whole new line of form and documentations for you to develop in order that the external consultants would be considered as a management representative.
Our comment - It all goes back to defining .You defined what is necessary now you must provide it - nothing is new.
Our comment - On one hand it is an improvement. The training must be reviewed before. But I think it's not such an improvement. Instead of testing your employees if they got anything of the training you must now check the training itself before. Only time will tell...
Our comment - They are totally right!
Our comment - That also puts an old debate aside. No longer can cruel owners of factories ignore these factors. Wait until they will combine OHSAS 18001...
Our comment - I agree with the "post delivery activities" - it wasn't clear enough for my opinion.
Our comment - That actually means that the product must be identifying not only on the shelves but also throughout the realization process.
Our comment - That means that from now on a computer that provides any kind of measurements services is considered a monitoring and measuring device. How can one calibrate a computer? Ask the supplier or your system administrator. They will know better than anyone.
So, what are the new requirements of the new standard? Statutory requirements are given scale as any other legal or customer's requirements. The statutory requirements are including the suppliers as well. A purchased process is just like any other product that the organization purchased. If it's affecting the product it must be under the quality system. You may include two quality processes in one document and split one process to two documents. The management representative must be a member of the management. A requirement to ensure that trainings are suitable for the product in advance and not to check if the training was effective after it was taken. Information system in now officially considered as a substructure. Parameters such as humidity, noise and temperatures, concerning the employees' health are considered as working environment. Measuring is considered as one of the activities of product realization. The product must be identifying not only on the shelves but also throughout the realization process. The management is now responsible for preventive and corrective actions regarding nonconformities that were discovered during audit. The organization should determine the type of the monitoring and measuring according to the processes and how will this affect the quality management system. Summery Most of the changes made here are really minor and are assistance for understanding open issues. We excepted more of from new standard but hey, isn't it enough as it is? The target wasn't to make any earth quakes in the quality industry but to keep update with changes in technology and to update the feedbacks and responses that were gathered over the last years. What a luck. We already thought that all our articles on our website should be changed... Itay Abuahv Eng. ISO 9001 QualityAbout the AuthorThe author is Itay Abuhav who is external consultant who decided to establish a quality management knowledge center providing articles, news with added values, offering solutions, help and tips regarding to all quality management systems and the ISO 9001 standard. please visit us at www.9001quality.com
Set as favorite
Bookmark
Email This
Hits: 7056 Comments (0)
![]() Write comment
|
| ISO 9001 Home |
| ISO 9001 2008 |
| ISO 9001 |
| Buy TQM Leads |